A recent raid at one of Pattaya’s bars that specializes in offering underage kids for punters to diddle – and yup, that’d be in Sunee Plaza – is the hot topic on at least two of the gay Thailand message boards right now. It has been getting the kind of participation seldom seen on Jabba The Butt’s board, but then that’s not surprising. Jabba – who has strongly advocated lowering the age of consent in the past and once ran a poll on the preferred age of bar boys, the low-end option of which started at the age of 8 – has always been a big fan of allowing child molesters to have free reign in his little corner of the internet. And while that is not true for SGT where once the P word was verboten, it’s good to see that except for a few Joes, Pattaya devotees are finally owning up to what everyone already knew: if you are looking for little kids to abuse Pattaya is the place for you. But if you are not in Thailand, no worries. The message boards too will extend a warm hand of welcome if child molestation is your thing.
The raid, as reported by several local news organizations, occurred at the Mic My bar earlier this week. In a joint operation between Thai immigration authorities and Social Welfare Officials 17 boys aged between 14 and 17 were found inside the bar. The boys were all available for sex in short-time rooms above the bar.
The bar manager and cashier were detained and are expected to be charged with human trafficking offences, and foreign patrons inside the bar were told to stay where they were until they were later taken to the Immigration Office in Jomtien where their immigration status was checked. A ‘lookout’ employee stationed outside the bar was also arrested and the bar’s owner is expected to be arrested once he is located.
The raid was the focus of an undercover operation, with an officer inside of the bar purchasing a young boy for sex from the mamasan. It had been planned after Immigration discovered that the bar had been smuggling boys under the age of 18 to work in the bar offering sexual service to Thai and foreign tourists.
Or as Jabba put it: “Oh well, there hasn’t been a raid at Sunee Plaza for quite awhile, so I guess a ‘let’s harass Sunee Plaza’ raid was about due . . .”
News of the raid of course should have been greeted on the boards with outrage over the underage sex coupled with gratitude that someone is finally doing something about the pedoes in paradise. But instead Jabba’s band of merry men read it as a warning that you should always carry a copy of your passport with you. I guess when child molesters are part of your daily life the more immediate concern is your own well-being. Though to be fair, the Irish contingent took a different tact, demanding that the police, mayor, and TAT explain their new policy that targets patrons of the city’s gay bars for persecution.
While one member of Jabba’s forum took the time to make several posts detailing his numerous visits to Mic My as well as another bar known to specialize in offering little kids to pedoes on the prowl, and took umbrage at another’s comment that punters should walk out of any bar where they witness underage employees being diddled by customers with the statement that then “there would be no Bars in Sunee and only 1 or 2 in BoysTown that you could enter”, Jabba was satisfied that “things are very different today than years ago. Most Sunee Plaza bars now hire only boys who are at least 18+ years old”.
A poster over at SGT seconded that motion going as far as to say that Mic My is the best run bar in Pattaya and, at worse, there are only a few underage bar boys working there at any given time. Even the Canadian contingent chimed in wanting to dispute the number of underage boys reported to have been caught up in the sweep saying, “I’ve spent loads of time in Sunee, and sure I’ve seen the odd guy who was quite obviously underage, but never have I walked into a bar and seen 17 of them.” Because evidently in Pattaya it’s not the act but its frequency that matters.
On both of the boards punters were livid that the bar’s customers had been taken to the police station. They felt that was wrong since there certainly is nothing illegal about sitting in a bar watching little naked kids cavort around the stage. They were equally incensed at the idea that as a customer they have any responsibility for failing to object to having little kids available for sex at their favorite bar, and Jabba said it was the responsibility of the police to put a stop to child molestation, not his. Much as you would have no responsibility for stopping at a red light but could just run it instead ‘cuz it’s the police department’s responsibility to enforce traffic laws, not yours to obey them.
Not long ago on SGT in another thread about pedoes in paradise one of the more despicable members quailed at the idea that that was a topic appropriate to a gay message board, saying that pedophilia has nothing to do with being gay. And he’s right. Pedophiles, pederasts, and kiddie molesters are about abuse, not sex. Just as rape is not about sex. Unfortunately he is also wrong. Because the gay community, especially in Pattaya, allows – and even welcomes – pedophiles to hide among them. And they are welcomed on the gay Thailand message boards too.
Jabba can claim he’s against underage sex all he wants, and he can claim he ‘votes with his feet’ but when you also advocate the lowering of the age of consent and run a message board where you allow members to specify ‘young boys’ as their interest, when you refuse to allow anyone to say negative things about your favorite haunt even though it has a well deserved rep for being a place where it’s easy to find children to prey upon, and when you want to blame the police, authorities, corruption, and anyone or anything else you can think of for the problem rather than the kiddie molesters . . . well, your actions speak much louder than your words.
The bar owners who hire children to service their customers only do so for one reason: money. The gay community in Pattaya can put a stop to the underage problem by refusing to patronize any bar that hires children. It’s not enough to say that you aren’t interested in the little kids and only off those of legal age. By continuing to help swell those bar owners’ bank accounts you are giving them your implicit approval to continue to abuse kids. One bar owner popped into the thread on SGT to pat himself on the back for refusing to hire underage kids. And he should be commended. But what does it say of that town when he is the exception to the rule? What is the message being sent when the practice is so prevalent that a bar owner expects accolades for not engaging in child prostitution?
It’s not like the problem with Mic My is new, or that it is only that bar. That it is one of the bars that specializes in offering young boys to pedophiles is not news, that rep has been around for sometime now. So have the sorry excuses for human beings who patronize the place. And they’re well represented on the boards. A simple search on SGT for Mic My brings up countless stories of “all the fun’ to be had there, along with the following quotes:
“My Mic has many assortments on the younger side as well as Nice Boys.”
“This bar seems to get raided more than others, so if your afraid of that then better not go there.”
“I am glad MIc My is still doing their thing. Id hate to go back there and see it gone.”
“My kind of place was Mic My. Tom Yum and the like so you know where my tastes were.”
“Mic My gogo soi VC if you like younger looking boys. Pattaya is by far best place.”
“There is no doubt if you have young boys in Sunee, the customers will increase dramatically.”
“You only have to look at the recent Bar New Sawatdee before it was closed. I stopped there once at 9pm and there were no seats and it was very easy to see why.”
Whenever the subject comes up on the boards the same tired excuses and discombobulations get pulled out once again. Innocent until proven guilty, it’s not just a problem in Pattaya, what about a 19 year old dating a 17 year old, you can’t believe what you read in the news, it’s not pedophilia it’s pederasty, it’s too difficult to read a Thai’s age, in some countries the age of consent is only 16 . . . none of which really addresses the issue. But does provide the smoke and mirrors pedophiles hide behind.
A new poster who’d been lurking for several years on SGT felt so welcomed by the conversation over the raid at Mic My that he made his first post claiming 90% of punters in Pattaya only like boys in their late teens to early twenties because they look like they are 14 or 15; ‘back home’ you’d have to actually have sex with underage kids while in Pattaya you can have the pleasure without its legal ramifications. He went on quite nonchalantly to say those after the 14-17 age boys in Pattaya really want 10 year olds. As though that thought was perfectly normal and was certainly not meant as a condemnation of those with that type of urge. To him Pattaya is where you go to have sex with boys who would land you in jail back home.
Of course he also wanted to make sure everyone knew he’s a pederast and not a pedophile. And claimed at heart so are his fellow fans of Sunee Plaza. Because when you are into molesting little kids it’s important to claim the correct label. I’d hope he is an exception to the rule, but his opinion of Pattaya devotees does explain why those who don’t engage in kiddie abuse ignore the problem of those who do: Many of them share the pedophile’s sickness in desire if not in action. When a child molester is arrested, for them it is a case of ‘There but for the grace of God, go I.’
It’s a shame that as the gay community is finding acceptance worldwide and opinions from those outside the community are changing, we still have to deal with the reputation of being a bunch of men who like to molest little kids. It’s even a greater shame that those of us who love Thailand are even further branded as child molesters. But then it’s difficult to convince others that we are not a bunch of pedophiles when by our inaction and preference for making excuses we allow pedophiles to be an accepted part of our community. Both on-line and in Pattaya.
Related Posts You Might Not Enjoy:
Dekar said:
When I saw the topic of your post I first thought: “God, why do they have to live on the same planet as me?”
After reading the post I also think that its a shame the police doesn’t use more advanced technologies. I have seen some reports from Russia and Urkraine, where they do the undercover job a little better and directly target the customers. I guess these kind of people still get a special treatment in most prisons…
Bangkokbois said:
Yes, pedoes do still get a special reception in prison. And a well-deserved one at that.
David Z said:
Thailand should immediately deport any customer found in a bar where underage boys are employed. It would not take long for those bars to be permanently emptied and it might teach the customers a lesson too.
Bangkokbois said:
Now that would put an end to 90% of the problem!
It’s time sexpats quit blaming the bars, the boys, and the police and start taking their share of responsibility.
Alex said:
That’s a sickening subject, and some of the board members’ comments really got my blood boiling. That doesn’t happen very often these days, but in this particular case, it doesn’t affect those who write that nonsense in the first place, because the victims are others. 🙁
I think what you’ve written about responsibility is very true. It’s far too easy to blame only the bars, if there was no specific demand they simply wouldn’t have any incentive to ’employ’ underage boys. Those patronizing bars with underage boys actively protect child molesters and support this disgusting ‘business model’.
I have a lot of sympathy for a commentator on Pattaya One News who wrote that bars of this kind should be burned to the ground. That might send a message, or two.
Bangkokbois said:
lol
Burning those bars to the ground.
I love how Thais manage to get to the root of the problem!
Of course that would just give the sexpats an opportunity to bitch about smoking in the bars some more.
I love how they get their panties in a twist and want to boycott bars where they allow smoking but have no problem with underage bar boys.
ChristianPFC said:
That picture on the top is hilarious! Sometimes when I sit in an internet cafe surrounded by minors (almost exclusively boys) playing online games (the minors, I read the gay blogs and forums), I think “This muste be a pedophile’s wet dream”.
Bangkokbois said:
Thanks for not posting that tip on Jabba’s board Christian!
🙂
Alex said:
Indeed, it’s not far-fetched. When the RTP made an attempt to enforce the hours Internet Cafés are allowed to admit minors, the possibility that they are at danger being there at night was one of the reasons cited. There were also a couple of reports, back then, of minors being molested by older patrons (Thais, in this case, no foreigners involved apparently).
Bangkokbois said:
Sounds like opening an internet cafe in Sunee would be a quick road to riches then.
Mitch S. said:
I’ve only been to Sunnee once on my first time in Pattaya. There was nothing amiss in the places my buddy (who was on an extended stay there) took the four of us to on a night life tour. Next stop was Boystown & we saw a couple of nice shows there. On subsequent trips, Boystown was a quick walk from the hotel, so no need to venture farther.
Anyway, if board posters regularly frequent bars that have underage workers, it’s very clear to me that they enjoy underage themselves & that they condone such child abuse in spite of what they write! Quite simply, if they had a problem with it, they would go elsewhere at a minimum. As it is, it’s like Boo Hoo claiming he only comes to Thailand to take “100% original photos” of flowers, puppy dogs & kittens. People can see through his bullshit just as clearly as with the pedo fan club posters!
Bangkokbois said:
LOL
Yeah, flowers, puppies, kittens and underage boys showing skin. Oh, my bad – that’s Thai Smiles.
bruce_nyc said:
What can members of the gay community do about it? Blaming the ordinary members of the gay community for “accepting” these pederists…. seems to me as silly as blaming the neighboring businesses…. None of us have any control over the offending bar owners and staff and the customers who are seeking underage boys. Just not patronizing such bars is going to have almost zero impact. We don’t patronize them anyway…. once we discover what’s on offer there. Just because we don’t patronize I’m, does not mean they’re going to go away anytime soon. Outrage over 14 year olds? Absolutely. But blaming the general gay community? That’s misplaced blame.
Bangkokbois said:
While I appreciate your attempt to provide an opposing opinion Bruce, your arguments don’t have legs and I’ve got to call bullshit on you. Refusing to patronize a bar that employs underage kids will have no impact on its future? Really? Kindly point me to an example where a successful business lost its customer base, refused to change, and remained successful. As far as your statement that “We don’t patronize them anyway” – the comments on the message boards say otherwise.
And sorry, I can blame the gay community in Thailand for allowing pedophiles to run amok in Pattaya. Your suggestion of doing nothing is the exact reason those places still exist. Perhaps you’ve heard ‘if you are not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem’ before?
bruce_nyc said:
No. You’re missing my point…
I am saying “we” ( at least, “I” ) do not patronize those places.
I went into Mic My exactly one time… on my first visit to Thailand… because I was taken there… ( by a well-known person in the Pattaya gay community, by the way )… I immediately determined that it wasn’t for me and left.
So, saying that I won’t patronize that place any more… Well… I don’t patronize it anyway. So the effect is a net effect of….. zero.
I am not that business’ customer base…. since I never go there.
My commnents on any message board do NOT say otherwise. Please don’t lump me in with someone else’s comments…. and don’t put words in my mouth… that I didn’t say.
If you can blame the gay community for pedophiles, then one could equally blame the monks….. and the beauticians….. and the Chinese tourists…. and the coconut water venders. They are all equally responsible, to the same extent, I suppose.
In fact, we could all blame you.
But that arguement that we, ordinary gay tourists, are somehow to blame… somehow responsible…. is misplaced blame.
If you want to DO SOMETHING about the problem… pointing fingers at innocent people… in a style of McCarthyism… is not part of the solution.
What are you doing to solve this problem? How are you part of the solution?
Bangkokbois said:
I didn’t miss your point Bruce. Because you were not making one. You were offering up excuses for doing nothing. That’s mimicking an ostrich, not making a point. Trying again and adding hyperbole this time around isn’t any better. I mean seriously, coconut water vendors are responsible for the underage sex problem in Pattaya? Anyone who speaks up against the kiddie diddler status quo is guilty of McCarthyism?
You seem to want to defend the gay community as innocents who have no responsibility for the despicable reputation Sunee and Pattaya have. And yet recount how on your first visit to Sunee a “well-known person in the Pattaya gay community” took you to a bar known to employ underage kids for sex.
Hello?
Lastly, I did not say YOUR comments on the boards say otherwise. What I said was:
As far as your statement that “We don’t patronize them anyway” – the comments on the message boards say otherwise.
Perhaps you missed the half dozen comments that I quoted in this article as examples of the permissive attitude Sunee fans exhibit toward the pedoes among them. Or perhaps you simply misinterpreted my comment, since you now claim to have been using the royal we.
I purposely did not include any mention of comments you have personally made on the boards in my reply to your comment posted here. I’ll be glad to if you would like, but you probably should go back and read those first . . .
bruce_nyc said:
Bottom Line: As YOU said… “If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.” So….. As I said… What are YOU, personally, doing to stop this problem? ( besides pointing fingers in outrage )
Bangkokbois said:
Yup, that’s what I thought.
I’m sure you’d like to call that a finger of outrage since it diminishes the intent, but the finger I’m pointing is one of disgust. Just to keep the record straight.
You want to know what I am doing about the problem of underage child abuse? Well, let me tell you what I’m not doing.
I’m not ignoring the problem, acting as though it doesn’t exist, or patting myself on the back ‘cuz the problem of underage prostitution in Sunee Plaza is so much better these days.
I’m not exonerating the gay community from their responsibility for the problem while blaming the bar owners, the boys, the police, Thai culture, the boys’ parents, or even coconut water vendors.
I’m not claiming that patrons of a bar with underage kids performing naked on stage are innocents who are doing nothing illegal. Or that they accidently stumbled into that bar when Sunee Plaza is a place you have to actively seek out (which would lead one to believe you’d also know the area’s rep for providing kids for punters to diddle).
I’m not trying to cloud the issue of pedophiles in Pattaya by bringing up the age of consent and its differences from one locale to another when the age of consent has nothing to do with trafficking in child prostitution.
I’m not trying to further cloud the issue by trying to reason it’s okay for a 19 year-old to have sex with a 16-year-old. ‘Cuz the patrons of Sunee bars are rarely if ever only 19 years of age.
I’m not trying to hide the real problem by claiming pedophiles are common, normal, and all of us have several friends who like to sexually most children.
I’m not attempting to run the discussion of the problem with underage sex off the tracks with pedantic claims about the true definition of the word pedophile, or backing that up with a dubious source link when the parent source notes that pedophile is commonly used for those who sexually abuse minors regardless of age.
I’m not hiring 18 year-old prostitutes who look like they are 15 because that satisfies my degenerate cravings while at least seeming to adhere to the letter of the law.
I’m not out spending my money in bars that employ underage kids – and then claiming I’m not part of the problem because I don’t off the little ones anyway.
I’m not remaining silent on the issue because some fool will start screaming persecution and McCarthyism as though we were discussing political beliefs instead of discussing the sick fucks who pay to molest little kids.
I’m not trying to convince others that refusing to patronize a bar known to traffic in child prostitution will have no effect on that bar’s business or future so there’s no good reason to not keep filling that bar’s owner’s bank account.
Now when you can honestly claim to not be doing the same Bruce, feel free to come back and ask your question about what I am doing about the problem again. Then it will be a legitimate query instead of yet another attempt to deflect attention from what the real issue is.
bruce_nyc said:
The real question is: What are you doing to solve the problem? Everything else is blame. Remember, in your own words, “If you’re not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.” What are you doing to solve it? What are you even recommending others do to solve the problem…? A long list of things to NOT do…. is NOT action. It’s inaction.
Bangkokbois said:
Are you really that dense?
(Rhetorical question.)
Marco said:
I think your article is greatly exagerated… I’ve been many times to Mic My and other similar Sunee bars; the boys tended to be 16 up; 16 year-olds are not children – let alone “little kids”, they’re late teenagers. If you ask them, they will tell you they make their own decisions and they make their own choices to come to work in a bar. Do they make their decisions with the maturity of an 18 year-old? Maybe not. Then again, does an 18 year-old make decisions with the maturity of a 20 year-old? Maybe not. 18 is not a magical number, it’s just a legal one.
The author of the blog likes chunkier, older guys – lucky for him, lots of choice for that in Thailand. I don’t think it’s reasonable to brand anyone interested in late teens as the devil incarnate. There is a word for that – ephebophiles. Just like one doesn’t choose being attracted to men or women, one doesn’t choose being attracted to younger or older boys. Who are you to judge?
I really don’t see any significant difference – other than the arbitrary legal construct – between a 16 year old selling sex, and an 18 year-old selling sex. Demonization of the customers of the 16 year olds and brandishing of the pedophile word are neither meaningful not helpful.