Tags
I usually prefer my male flesh in color, but this week I’m going with a series of sepia-toned pix because even in a less colorful depiction some guy’s hotness still shines through.
Monday Muscle #13
26 Monday Mar 2012
Posted in It's A Gay World, Monday Muscle
thanks for all these sexy pics – where do you get them all from?
Thanks John. I used to run a pictorial blog of hot male models so I’ve tons of pix on my spare hard drive.
The rest come off a dozen or so blogs I visit weekly.
If I was a nice guy I’d credit the source when I post one I ripped off someone else’s site, but then I’d actually have to make a note where I found them instead of just clicking ‘save’.
“If I was a nice guy I’d credit the source when I post one I ripped off someone else’s site, but then I’d actually have to make a note where I found them instead of just clicking ‘save’.”
If someone was going around copying articles from blogs – including yours – and reposting them as their own would you be just as blasé?
Yes bkkguy, I would be. Or should say am. Words I’ve written and posted pop up all over the internet with an alarming frequency. With no attribution. So what? If anything, I take it as a compliment. Perhaps if I was attempting to make money out of my blog I’d feel differently. But since I’m not, I don’t.
But my comment in this post was about pictures not words. I don’t rip of the writing of others, though I do often steal facts off of Wikipedia and post them in an article with only slight modification. I could take the time to note every source I’ve used and list them in footnotes, but this blog is supposed to be for fun, not a scholarly effort.
Pictures of naked men that have been posted and re-posted again and again all over the internet – which was what I was referring to – are not worth tracking down the photographer and giving him the credit he deserves. In most cases it’d be an impossible task anyway as there is nothing in the shot to tell you who took it. And wherever I found it was on a post that took the photo from another site, which took the photo from a different site, that grabbed the shot from some other site . . . .
I’ve also run across pictures that I have taken and posted showing up elsewhere on the ‘net. It’s like running across an old friend. Again, big whoop, who cares? Short of someone who is a professional photographer and whose livelihood depends on his work, where is the harm? Seems damn petty to me. And when I do use a specific and known artist’s work I usually post an article highlighting his stuff and include a link to his site.
WHY on earth that you always wanted to become yours anything you saw and desired???!! so Posessive! I will be the model one day !!!
And is the moon picture in the TV just a coincidence? I found both the photographer and the guy are really insulting…
Huh. I’d not noticed the double moons before!
Yeah, if it were in media, they will make a statement like this: ‘It’s simply only because I want to respect the creation of Gods. It’s a worship – How, men, they’re just born very lovely…and the most perfect among the other creations (ps. the moon and its surface)’
Not to mention it shines brighter than the moon itself as you can see. uh huh….
I love his round ass, I want to grab it while he’s inside me